Showing posts with label George Michel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Michel. Show all posts

Tuesday, 28 January 2014

JLF 2014, Day 4: Information Overload!

Day 4 was another intense day, which saw me busy attending a session during each time slot.

The first session I attended was 'Bright Young Things of the Jazz Age' with Lara Feigel, Sarah Churchill and Nicholas Shakespeare talking about the party animal writers of the 20s on both sides of the Atlantic (the US and UK).  Fitzgerald occupied the limelight in this conversation.  This was a lively session, both because Sarah and Lara were animated speakers and because of the subject matter.  The writers conjured up a world of whacky parties organised by the literary luminaries of the time who were drinking themselves silly  (perhaps I should down a couple of pegs each time I am stumped for words).  This frenetic partying came to an end because it could not be sustained both economically and physically.  What probably qualifies as the trivia of the festival, comes from this session, the word 'jazz' originated from the word 'jism' which was slang for sperm!

Next, was Adrian Levy's session on his book, The Seige, on 26/11.  Adrian dwelt at length on David Headley, a hybrid character who was able to inhabit two contradictory worlds, that of the liberal USA and the terrorist outfits of Pakistan. Levy when quizzed did acknowledge that the Indian intelligence services should have been prepared for such an attack as there was ample intelligence trickling in about such a possibility.  Moreover, according to him, the Pradhan Commission is really not enough as it stands at only 64 pages, which means that there is no act of learning on the part of the Indian government!  The most impressive thing about Levy was how at the very start of the session he credited his wife, his co-author, without  whom this book would not have been possible.  He also later on jokingly stated that in their partnership he was the 'Carrie' and she with her forensic approach was the 'Saul' of their relationship!

Rana Dasgupta was on in the third session, presenting his book Capital.  He explained Delhi's extravagant spending habits of today as a shift from the post-1947 fixation on the idea of wealth being the accumulation of gold.  He theorised that today's Punjabi culture of Delhi was not a Pre-1947 Punjabi culture but rather a post-traumatic Punjabi culture, which was a 180 degree turn to embrace the tangibles in their lives.  He also read an extract from the beginning his book--a description of a farmhouse with sheer glass screens into which he walked straight in...reminiscent perhaps, of another Delhi palace centuries ago where someone mistook a pool for the floor.

Post lunch, one caught Mary Beard talking about Pompeii.  It was delightful to see her passion for an archaeological site.  Even more interesting, for a person who had visited Pompeii, was the realisation that a lot of what one is told about the site is, well, tourist guide myths.  Mary began by stating that a significant amount of Pompeii's appeal was similar to that of a disaster movie with its sense of doom.  Moreover, it is the one place one can go to and get really close to Roman daily life.  One can get an idea of what the Pompeians thought, their view of the world, from the graffiti on the brothel walls to the Indian statuette from an ordinary house to a chamber pot.  On the other hand, there is a lot that is not known about Pompeii. 

The pre-tea slot had numerous options...I hate being torn so, but for me there was only one choice--George Michell on Vijaynagar.  For anyone who has read his articles in college, this was a wow moment--to hear the scholar in person, especially when he made the talk fun, peppering it with his wry humour.  Michell gave a guided lecture on Vijaynagar, with slides to show the buildings he was describing (Delhi University lecturers should take a page out of his book!). 
He stated that Vijayangar is a very important site of Hindu Imperial architecture, as it is the earliest and most important of such sites.  It was one of the wealthiest cities of all Asia in its time, similar to Bagan or Angkor.  Also, unlike other Indian sites, after the city came to an end, it was abandoned, making it a delight for historians.
However, studies till date have posed more questions about the site than answers.  This would explain archaeologists believing that the chariot shrine had elephants on it, when there were originally horses.  It also explains why scholars are not sure how the royal centre functioned. 
This extraordinary landscape of granite rocks was chosen, according to Michell, as it provided a good defence system, it enabled the citizens to develop a hydraulic system, the kings of Vijayanager were local boys and this site had an inherent sanctity as it was imbued with myths (the Kishkindha chapter of the Ramayana was supposed to have taken place here, while the local goddess is supposed to have married Shiva, known here as Pampapati). 
He pointed out how the technique of using columns carved out of a single slab of stone, typical of South Indian temple architecture, first originated here.   In his opinion, a close study of the Dusshera platform reveals figures wearing hats particular to Central Asia, which suggests that Central Asians worked for the Vijayanagar kings. He felt that Vijaynagar was an "Islamicised Hindu court" while Bahmani was a "Hinduised Islamic court" due to the intermingling of the different forms of architecture. 
By the end of the lecture, all I wanted to do was catch the next flight out to Vijayanagar, instead I had to content myself by putting it high on my travel list. 

The last session of the day, that I attended, was 'Sex and the Citadel' with Shereen El Feki sharing her findings.  What I found particularly interesting to learn was that there has been a long history of Arabic erotica prior to the rise of Islamic fundamentalism.  I do think it is important to remember that the Arabic countries were not always so conservative, but that their conservatism is a relatively recent development. 
 

Sunday, 19 January 2014

Jaipur Literature Festival 2014, Day 2--A Critique

Day two saw my initial euphoria of being at the literature festival subside and replaced by a more exacting frame of mind.  I spent the day classifying writers into good and bad speakers, for despite being masters of the word, not every writer is necessarily a good speaker. So, who were the good and the bad and the indifferent....(of the sessions I attended)?

Interestingly, some of the best speakers were professors...after all if you want to hold your class' attention you better be a good orator!  Professors whose classrooms I would love to be in include:
Marcus du Sautoy--whose fascinating lecture on symmetry and the language of maths made me, a totally non-maths person, pick up his book Finding Moonshine!
Anthony Beevor--always great to listen to him.  While talking about non-fiction he pin-pointed the problem with historical fiction--a genre that I find uncomfortable dealing with.  According to him, the problem with historical fiction is ascribing thoughts and feelings to real, historical figures.
Reza Aslan, a consistently engaging speaker, mentioned how he does not like the distinction between fiction and non-fiction to be that the latter is true.  Rather he prefers to define non-fiction as being tethered to reality.  He explained that the non-fiction tag gives a voyeuristic layer to the story which makes it more true.  He also stated that the goal of all writing is to reveal character.

Other impressive non-professor writers were:
Xiaolu Guo who pointed out that East Asian writing was more poetic and less narrative than that of the Western world and then went on to condemn American Literature as being over-rated.  I do admire such people who don't hesitate to speak their minds and I do agree with her when I think of Franzen's Freedom!
Nadifa Mohammed a very articulate speaker pointed out that FGM in Somalia is a part of every day life and therefore is regarded in a different way than outsiders view it.
Jim Crace--always wonderful to listen to.  According to him 'global novels' are non-English novels that capture the imagination more than the country they are written in such as Achebe's and Marquez's works.
Fariba Hachtroubi--what a passionate speaker!  She totally held one's attention and had so much to say about Iran and women's rights, echoing Gloria Steinem and Shereen El Faki, in the importance of having control over one's own body.
Shereen El Faki pointed out how the Arabs a thousand years ago were very open about sexuality and that it is Islamic fundamentalism that has made the discourse on sexuality so narrow.  I am definily attending her session on 'Sex and the Citadel'.
Carsten Jensen with his engaging anecdotes has proved  to be a great writer to listen to.  Today's anecdotes were about how reading helped calm and reassure him whether as a young child scared in his room or an adult travelling on a dangerous road to Kabul.
Andrew Graham-Dixon's session on Caravaggio I hear was amazing.  I got to hear a bit from him on the session on 'How can the sacred be sensuous' and I could understand why his earlier session was such a hit.  Here he pointed out that in Boticelli's Birth of Venus, the cloak being held by Venus was shaped as a vagina--only the male eye could figure that one!  Guess I better examine the painting carefully now.
George Michell.  I guess I was already biased in his favour having enjoyed studying his works in univ.  I was so disappointed that he spoke so briefly today as the others were monopolising the show.  In the session on the sensuous and sacred focusing on Indian temple art, he stated that there was a strong connection between the court and the notion of what a beautiful image was and that 90% of the imagery of the Indian temple was that of the privileged elite.  I can't wait to hear more from him on Monday.
Samantha Shannon, I place her under this category not because she made a huge impact on me but because I think that what she has achieved so far is very credible and because she was interesting to listen to, despite her young age.  I liked the way she pointed out how YA which is supposed to refer to a target audience of 12 to 18, now refers to a genre of fiction!

Writers who are proficient speakers but failed to impress were:
Jhumpa Lahiri:  she is an intelligent writer and made several pertinent points, but lacked the x factor...
Vidya Dehija...yes she is a professor but her lecture with loads of quotes from tamil poets was not terribly exciting.  I found her whole perspective very westernised starting with her investigation into why the sacred in India is sensuous, for this is not a strange thing for Indians.  Furthermore, I felt that this approach led her to a superficial explanation that it was a way for the patrons to ask to be  blessed with conjugal bliss.  Yet, we do know that the sexual images in places of worship in
India have a deeper meaning...a way of attaining another plane of awareness through the release of sexual energy.

The challenged speakers were:
Bejan Matur...in her case I think not being a native English speaker proved difficult for her, so while she made some interesting points she failed to excite one's imagination.
Nadeem Aslam...an extremely disappointing speaker, especially given that his books have been so well received.
Cyrus Mistry was perhaps the worst speaker...but he  went up in my esteem by publicly acknowledging that public speaking was not his forte.  I will read his Chronicle of a Corpse Bearer, as it just won the DSC prize for South Asian Literature.

So, as you can see today was quite an intense day, because of which I am only going to attend the second half of the day tomorrow.  Well, the real reason actually is that strangely no session in the first half rally appeals to me.